<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>dstowell.org/write - Latest Comments</title><link>http://dstowell.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://dstowell.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 06:08:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: The essays I did and didn&amp;#8217;t write</title><link>http://dstowell.org/write/2008/02/29/the-essays-i-did-and-didnt-write/#comment-571050</link><description>&lt;p&gt;On pragmatism in English class:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In writing workshop last semester, the professor paraphrased a quote about film, the original source of which escapes my meager googling ability:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"100 people watching the same film will actually see 100 different films."&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In essence, though you could pseudo-academically explain any theory on a work with suitable material to back yourself up, it doesn't matter because everyone's relationship to the work is inherently personal, subjective and unique.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, every genuine interpretation must be considered equally valid.  Which means, I suppose, that the world must be exactly as mundane and complex as we each think it is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">shy</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 06:08:44 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>